‘Executions
By Guillotine’
Passed
In The United States
Wednesday, July 23,
2014
Government Is Pushing For Nationwide Use!
They passed laws in Georgia to allow for the use of
the guillotine on death row. But were you also aware a federal judge has now joined
the ranks of those pushing for the use of guillotines nationwide? Now do you
see why they “botch” executions? They need to make the people demand a better
way to kill. PROPHECY WILL BE FULFILLED!
Revelation
20:4
And
I saw thrones, and they sat on them, and judgment was committed to them. Then I
saw the souls of those who had been beheaded for their witness to Jesus
and for the word of God, who had not worshiped the beast or his image, and had
not received his mark on their foreheads or on their hands. And they lived
and reigned with Christ for a thousand years.
We are very close!
All of the cards are being put into place right now for the final events that
are before us—the events spoken of in the book of Daniel, and the book of
Revelation.
Guillotine,
firing squads better than lethal injection, says prominent federal judge
Washington
Post
Executions
are “brutal, savage events” — and if society wants to carry them out, it
ought to stop pretending otherwise, forget about lethal injections and return
to “more primitive — and foolproof — methods.”
Like the guillotine — or on second thought,
the firing squad.
That’s the view of Alex Kozinski, one of the nation’s most
prominent appeals court judges, a Ronald Reagan appointee generally
regarded as a libertarian conservative and, by standards of the judiciary, a
bit of a “troublemaker,” who likes to stir the pot.
Kozinski dissented Monday from a decision of the full U.S.
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit to stay the execution of Joseph R. Wood
until Arizona told Wood more about the drugs that would be used in the
execution and the personnel who would carry it out.
Kozinski let loose on the whole attempt, as he put it, to
“mask the brutality of executions by making them look serene and
peaceful — like something any one of us might experience in our final
moments.”
Executions “are, in fact, nothing like that …
and nothing the state tries to do can mask that reality,” he wrote. If the
state’s going to kill, it should at least do it effectively, he said.
“The guillotine is
probably best but seems inconsistent with our national ethos. And the electric
chair, hanging and the gas chamber are each subject to occasional mishaps. The
firing squad strikes me as the most promising. Eight or ten large-caliber rifle
bullets fired at close range,” he
wrote in his dissent, “can inflict massive damage, causing instant death
every time. There are plenty of people employed by the state who can pull the
trigger and have the training to aim true.”
Unlike drugs used for lethal injections, he said, guns and
ammunition are bought by the state “in massive quantities for law enforcement
purposes, so it would be impossible to interdict the supply. And nobody can
argue that the weapons are put to a purpose for which they were not intended,”
as unlike medications, “firearms have no purpose other than destroying their
targets.”
In case you’re wondering, Kozinski is not anti-capital
punishment. But he’s always had problems with the way the death penalty is
handled in the courts.
Legal journalist Emily Bazelon described his views in a
2004 Legal Affairs article. Subhed: “If the Ninth Circuit were a circus — and
some say it is — Alex Kozinski would be its ringmaster. Presenting the most
controversial judge on our most controversial court.” She wrote: He proclaims
that “vicious killers deserve to be executed,” yet he has voted to stay
execution in almost half of the published decisions about death row cases in
which he has participated. He has also called for the death penalty to be
reserved for the most heinous criminals — “mass murderers, hired killers,
airplane bombers.”
